Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
J Clin Transl Hepatol ; 10(3): 522-530, 2022 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2288576

ABSTRACT

Recent reports of acute hepatitis of unknown origin in previously healthy children have been increasing worldwide. The main characteristics of the affected children were jaundice and gastrointestinal symptoms. Their serum aminotransaminase levels were above 500 IU/L, with negative tests for hepatitis viruses A-E. By 31 May 2022, the outbreak had affected over 800 children under the age of 16 years in more than 40 countries, resulting in acute liver failure in approximately 10%, including at least 21 deaths and 38 patients requiring liver transplantation. There was still no confirmed cause or causes, although there were several different working hypotheses, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), adenovirus serotype 41, or SARS-CoV-2 superantigen-mediated immune cell activation. Here, we review early observations of the 2022 outbreak which may inform diagnosis, treatment, and prevention in the context of an overlapping COVID-19 pandemic.

2.
J Clin Med ; 11(19)2022 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2066186

ABSTRACT

Drones may be able to deliver automated external defibrillators (AEDs) directly to bystanders of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) events, improving survival outcomes by facilitating early defibrillation. We aimed to provide an overview of the available literature on the role and impact of drones in AED delivery in OHCA. We conducted this scoping review using the PRISMA-ScR and Arksey and O'Malley framework, and systematically searched five bibliographical databases (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsychInfo and Scopus) from inception until 28 February 2022. After excluding duplicate articles, title/abstract screening followed by full text review was conducted by three independent authors. Data from the included articles were abstracted and analysed, with a focus on potential time savings of drone networks in delivering AEDs in OHCA, and factors that influence its implementation. Out of the 26 included studies, 23 conducted simulations or physical trials to optimise drone network configuration and evaluate time savings from drone delivery of AEDs, compared to the current emergency medical services (EMS), along with 1 prospective trial conducted in Sweden and 2 qualitative studies. Improvements in response times varied across the studies, with greater time savings in rural areas. However, emergency call to AED attachment time was not reduced in the sole prospective study and a South Korean study that accounted for weather and topography. With growing interest in drones and their potential use in AED delivery spurring new research in the field, our included studies demonstrate the potential advantages of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) network implementation in controlled environments to deliver AEDs faster than current EMS. However, for these time savings to translate to reduced times to defibrillation and improvement in OHCA outcomes, careful evaluation and addressing of real-world delays, challenges, and barriers to drone use in AED delivery is required.

3.
Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology ; 10(3):522-530, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1929569

ABSTRACT

Recent reports of acute hepatitis of unknown origin in previously healthy children have been increasing worldwide. The main characteristics of the affected children were jaundice and gastrointestinal symptoms. Their serum aminotransaminase levels were above 500 IU/L, with negative tests for hepatitis viruses A–E. By 31 May 2022, the outbreak had affected over 800 children under the age of 16 years in more than 40 countries, resulting in acute liver failure in approximately 10%, including at least 21 deaths and 38 patients requiring liver transplantation. There was still no confirmed cause or causes, although there were several different working hypotheses, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), adenovirus serotype 41, or SARS-CoV-2 superantigen-mediated immune cell activation. Here, we review early observations of the 2022 outbreak which may inform diagnosis, treatment, and prevention in the context of an overlapping COVID-19 pandemic. Graphical

4.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0260251, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1546950

ABSTRACT

There continue to be conflicting data regarding the outcomes of people with HIV (PWH) who have COVID-19 infection with most studies describing the early epidemic. We present a single site experience spanning a later timeframe from the first report on January 21, 2020 to January 20, 2021 and describe clinical outcomes and predictors of hospitalization among a cohort of PWH in an urban center in Connecticut, USA. Among 103 PWH with controlled HIV disease, hospitalization occurred in 33% and overall mortality was 1%. HIV associated factors (CD4 count, HIV viral suppression) were not associated with hospitalization. Chronic lung disease (OR: 3.35, 95% CI:1.28-8.72), and cardiovascular disease (OR: 3.4, 95% CI:1.27-9.12) were independently associated with hospitalization. An increasing number of non-communicable comorbidities increased the likelihood of hospitalization (OR: 1.61, 95% CI:1.22-2.13).


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , HIV Infections/pathology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/virology , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Comorbidity , Connecticut , Female , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Noncommunicable Diseases/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
5.
J Cardiol ; 79(4): 482-488, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1487851

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection have been explored by clinicians and researchers all over the world. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of atrioventricular block (AV) in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and its association between in-hospital morbidity and mortality. METHODS: In-hospital electrocardiograms (ECGs) of 438 patients were compared with their prior or baseline ECGs to ascertain the development of new onset AV block. Patients who developed new AV blocks were then followed at 30 and 90 days post-discharge to check for resolution of AV block. Demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and complications during their hospital stay were evaluated. Major complications including respiratory failure requiring oxygen supplementation and mechanical ventilation, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, elevated troponins, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, as well as death were compared between those who developed new onset AV blocks and those who did not. RESULTS: Based on our single center study, the incidence of new onset AV blocks among patients admitted for COVID-19 during the study period was 5.5 cases per 100 patients. New onset AV blocks were not associated with longer hospital and ICU length of stay, increased intubation rates, or increased mortality. CONCLUSION: Although the development of a new onset AV block is most likely multifactorial and not solely due to COVID-19, it is still important for clinicians to be mindful about the possibility of developing symptomatic bradycardia and life-threatening arrhythmias in patients admitted for COVID-19. This can be achieved by appropriate rhythm monitoring in-patient but the need for a cardiac event monitor upon discharge is unlikely to be necessary. Careful history taking, including family and drug use history is also of great importance as emerging drug therapies for COVID-19 have potential arrhythmogenic effects.


Subject(s)
Atrioventricular Block , COVID-19 , Aftercare , Atrioventricular Block/epidemiology , Atrioventricular Block/etiology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Incidence , Patient Discharge , SARS-CoV-2
6.
CHEST ; 160(4):A1345-A1345, 2021.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1460860
7.
Chest ; 158(4):A534-A535, 2020.
Article in English | PMC | ID: covidwho-1385244

ABSTRACT

SESSION TITLE: Medical Student/Resident Chest Infections Posters SESSION TYPE: Med Student/Res Case Rep Postr PRESENTED ON: October 18-21, 2020 INTRODUCTION: Cystic fibrosis (CF) often leads to a double-lung transplant, making patients highly vulnerable to viral infections. For instance, the H1N1 influenza pandemic affected many people, with those who incurred it suffering significant morbidity. A recent study published in the Journal of Cystic Fibrosis has shown 40 confirmed cases of CF patients with SARS-CoV-2 worldwide up to April 2020. This is a unique case of a cystic fibrosis patient with ARDS with SARS-CoV-2 that required mechanical ventilation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 23-year-old Caucasian male with double-lung transplant due to cystic fibrosis, complicated by pancreatic insufficiency presented with acute dyspnea, cough, and fever. He was immunosuppressed due to tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and chronic prednisone use. His mycophenolate was held in the setting of presumed sepsis however his tacrolimus and prednisone were continued given the risk of rejection. Subsequently, his respiratory status rapidly declined prompting admission to the Intensive Care Unit for mechanical ventilation. Computed tomography of the chest endorsed worsening acute respiratory distress syndrome-like feature requiring high positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] settings. Labs revealed elevated d-dimer, CRP, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and clinical features consistent with cytokine storm. Recent literature suggested a possible role of tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 antibody. He received 400mg of Tocilizumab, following which the patient drastically improved. ICU care was challenging because of potential pharmacologic variance and adynamic ileus in the setting of cystic fibrosis with sedation and paralytics. Patient was liberated after 5 days of mechanical ventilation. Interestingly, he remained SARS-COV-2 positive post discharge for several weeks afterward. DISCUSSION: This critically ill immunosuppressed patient, unusually, exhibited rapid recovery. From the 40 patients in the study from Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, there was no mortality reported and only one patient reported to require mechanical ventilation associated with SARS-CoV-2. Factors that may have influenced this patient's recovery and lower mortality is the prompt use of Tocilizumab and his young age. Tocilizumab is currently an experimental medication, noted to inhibit further clinical deterioration. CONCLUSION(S): Fortunately, this case did not have long term consequences, however, that may not be the norm. Many CF patients have double lung transplants and the long-term impact of SARS-CoV-2 amongst CF patients is not known. More research may be warranted for the long-term effects of CF patients with SARS-CoV-2. Reference #1: Rebecca Cosgriff, Susannah Ahern, Scott C. Bell, Keith Brownlee, Pierre-Regis Burgel, Cass Byrnes, Harriet Corvol, Stephanie Y. Cheng, Alexander Elbert, Albert Faro, Christopher H. Goss, Vincent Gulmans, Bruce C. Marshall, Edward McKone, Peter G. Middleton, Rasa Ruseckaite, Anne L. Stephenson, Siobhan B Carr, A multinational report to characterise SARS-CoV-2 infection in people with cystic fibrosis,Journal of Cystic Fibrosis,2020 Reference #2: Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, Cheng Z, Yu T, Xia J, Wei Y, Wu W, Xie X, Yin W, Li H, Liu M, Xiao Y, Gao H, Guo L, Xie J, Wang G, Jiang R, Gao Z, Jin Q, Wang J, Cao B. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. Epub 2020 Jan 24. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020 Jan 30. Reference #3: L. Viviani, B.M. Assael, E. Kerem ECFS (A) H1N1 study group. Impact of the A (H1N1) pandemic influenza (season 2009-2010) on patients with cystic fibrosis J Cyst Fibros, 10 (5) (2011), pp. 370-376, 10.1016/j.jcf.2011.06.004 Epub 2011 Jul 12. PMID: 21752728 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Shubham Adroja, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Ansaam Daoud, source=Web Response No r levant relationships by Randall Harris, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Joseph Michael Lim, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Sujith Modugula, source=Web ResponseCopyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians

8.
Gastroenterology ; 161(3): 1011-1029.e11, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1240783

ABSTRACT

This guideline provides updated recommendations on the role of preprocedure testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) in individuals undergoing endoscopy in the post-vaccination period and replaces the prior guideline from the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) (released July 29, 2020). Since the start of the pandemic, our increased understanding of transmission has facilitated the implementation of practices to promote patient and health care worker (HCW) safety. Simultaneously, there has been increasing recognition of the potential harm associated with delays in patient care, as well as inefficiency of endoscopy units. With widespread vaccination of HCWs and the general population, a re-evaluation of AGA's prior recommendations was warranted. In order to update the role of preprocedure testing for SARS-CoV2, the AGA guideline panel reviewed the evidence on prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV2 infections in individuals undergoing endoscopy; patient and HCW risk of infections that may be acquired immediately before, during, or after endoscopy; effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in reducing risk of infections and transmission; patient and HCW anxiety; patient delays in care and potential impact on cancer burden; and endoscopy volumes. The panel considered the certainty of the evidence, weighed the benefits and harms of routine preprocedure testing, and considered burden, equity, and cost using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Based on very low certainty evidence, the panel made a conditional recommendation against routine preprocedure testing for SARS-CoV2 in patients scheduled to undergo endoscopy. The panel placed a high value on minimizing additional delays in patient care, acknowledging the reduced endoscopy volumes, downstream impact on delayed cancer diagnoses, and burden of testing on patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Endoscopy , Mass Screening/standards , Pandemics , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Endoscopy/standards , Gastroenterology/standards , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
9.
12.
Gastroenterology ; 159(1):320-334.e27, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-683713

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Multiple gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, including diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and abdominal pain, as well as liver enzyme abnormalities, have been variably reported in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This document provides best practice statements and recommendations for consultative management based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of international data on GI and liver manifestations of COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search to identify published and unpublished studies using OVID Medline and preprint servers (medRxiv, LitCovid, and SSRN) up until April 5, 2020;major journal sites were monitored for US publications until April 19, 2020. We pooled the prevalence of diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain, as well as liver function tests abnormalities, using a fixed-effect model and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework. RESULTS: We identified 118 studies and used a hierarchal study selection process to identify unique cohorts. We performed a meta-analysis of 47 studies including 10,890 unique patients. Pooled prevalence estimates of GI symptoms were as follows: diarrhea 7.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.2%-8.2%), nausea/vomiting 7.8% (95% CI, 7.1%-8.5%), and abdominal pain 2.7% (95% CI, 2.0%-3.4%). Most studies reported on hospitalized patients. The pooled prevalence estimates of elevated liver abnormalities were as follows: aspartate transaminase 15.0% (95% CI, 13.6%-16.5%) and alanine transaminase 15.0% (95% CI, 13.6%-16.4%). When we compared studies from China to studies from other countries in subgroup analyses, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and liver abnormalities were more prevalent outside of China, with diarrhea reported in 18.3% (95% CI, 16.6%-20.1%). Isolated GI symptoms were reported rarely. We also summarized the Gl and liver adverse effects of the most commonly utilized medications for COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: GI symptoms are associated with COVID-19 in <10% of patients. In studies outside of China, estimates are higher. Further studies are needed with standardized GI symptoms questionnaires and liver function test checks on admission to better quantify and qualify the association of these symptoms with COVID-19. Based on findings from our meta-analysis, we provide several Best Practice Statements for the consultative management of COVID-19.

13.
Hepatology ; 72(4): 1169-1176, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-684391

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality attributable to pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and multiorgan failure. Liver injury has been reported as a nonpulmonary manifestation of COVID-19, but characterization of liver test abnormalities and their association with clinical outcomes is incomplete. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,827 patients with confirmed COVID-19 who were hospitalized within the Yale-New Haven Health System between March 14, 2020 and April 23, 2020. Clinical characteristics, liver tests (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alanine aminotransferase [ALT], alkaline phosphatase [ALP], total bilirubin [TBIL], and albumin) at three time points (preinfection baseline, admission, and peak hospitalization), and hospitalization outcomes (severe COVID-19, intensive care unit [ICU] admission, mechanical ventilation, and death) were analyzed. Abnormal liver tests were commonly observed in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, both at admission (AST 66.9%, ALT 41.6%, ALP 13.5%, and TBIL 4.3%) and peak hospitalization (AST 83.4%, ALT 61.6%, ALP 22.7%, and TBIL 16.1%). Most patients with abnormal liver tests at admission had minimal elevations 1-2× the upper limit of normal (ULN; AST 63.7%, ALT 63.5%, ALP 80.0%, and TBIL 75.7%). A significant proportion of these patients had abnormal liver tests prehospitalization (AST 25.9%, ALT 38.0%, ALP 56.8%, and TBIL 44.4%). Multivariate analysis revealed an association between abnormal liver tests and severe COVID-19, including ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and death; associations with age, male sex, body mass index, and diabetes mellitus were also observed. Medications used in COVID-19 treatment (lopinavir/ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine, remdesivir, and tocilizumab) were associated with peak hospitalization liver transaminase elevations >5× ULN. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal liver tests occur in most hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and may be associated with poorer clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/physiopathology , Liver/physiopathology , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant , Liver Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL